Posted by
Chris – March 30, 2006
Albert Mohler raises some questions today about Joel Osteen’s theology.
The first question is this — Would anyone watching his television program, or sitting in his vast church facility, hear in Mr. Osteen’s message a clear and undiluted message of Gospel proclamation? Would this person have any reason, based on hearing Mr. Osteen’s message, to know himself as a sinner and to understand how the cross of Christ is the only ground of his salvation? Would he come to know that Jesus the Christ is fully human and fully divine, and that He came in order that we might have everlasting life — not just a good parking space?
My friend John watches (and apparently enjoys) Osteen from time to time, describing him as the “dinner mint” – light and unoffensive, a nice refresher after a heavier dinner. I haven’t watched enough of Osteen to really be allowed an opinion, but what bothers me more is that there are thousands of people for whom his saccharine sermons are the only spiritual food they ingest during the week. It’s not enough.
HT: Michael Spencer at Boar’s Head Tavern
Posted by
Chris – March 30, 2006
Got a phone call from Mom and a text message from Rebecca letting me know that they (and Ryan and Dad) are back safely from their trip to Panama. Sounds like everybody had a great time. I’m looking forward to seeing the pictures.
Posted by
Chris – March 30, 2006
Got a phone call from Mom and a text message from Rebecca letting me know that they (and Ryan and Dad) are back safely from their trip to Panama. Sounds like everybody had a great time. I’m looking forward to seeing the pictures.
Posted by
Chris – March 30, 2006
Got a phone call from Mom and a text message from Rebecca letting me know that they (and Ryan and Dad) are back safely from their trip to Panama. Sounds like everybody had a great time. I’m looking forward to seeing the pictures.
Posted by
Chris – March 30, 2006
Michael Spencer has Postcard To a Young Theologian #4 out today.
4. Determine to be part of a community where the concept of leadership is fully New Testament in its understanding of the relation of clergy and laity, and is free from the exaggerated and harmful adoration/veneration of personalities so common in unhealthy groups.
Parts 1 – 3.
Posted by
Chris – March 29, 2006

Hustle, Episode 2. They haven’t managed to come up with cool episode names or anything like that. OK, I can survive. 
Originally aired January 14th, 2006.
In this episode, the senior member of the gang, Albert, gets caught cheating at cards and gets severely beaten. While he is in the hospital recovering (and scamming his fellow patients), the rest of the gang has to figure out how to con the guy who administered the beating. He is rich, doesn’t seem to have many vices. But he loves the old movies. So Stacie poses as an American film actress and Danny poses as a bigshot producer in need of cash. Then the fun begins.
One of the unique artistic devices they regularly use in Hustle is a stop-motion effect where the people that are being conned all go into freeze-frame, but the grifters carry on a conversation, interact with each other (and sometimes the freeze-framed folks) and so on. The show uses this device to elaborate a bit (in a stylish way) about what the characters are thinking. They will also sometimes use this without the stop-action – they’ll just stop everything in the scene and start off in some fantasy direction for a couple of minutes, then come right back as if nothing happened.
In this particular episode of Hustle, Danny and Mickey do a song-and-dance routine right out of a 1940’s musical. It’s the creative way of showing that they talked the mark into taking the deal, without actually having to write the dialogue. I’m not a huge fan of this strategy in general, but it fits into the style of the show, and it does save some tedious dialogue.
The ending of this show is quite funny, too; Danny (as the film producer) gets the mark, under the guise of taking a screen test, to record a whole apology to Albert. Sweet, sweet revenge.
Posted by
Chris – March 28, 2006
I don’t think I’ve mentioned it much before, but I’ve become a big fan of Hustle, a relatively new show on AMC, Saturday nights at 9 PM Central time. Think of it as a cool British version of of Ocean’s 11, but in an hour-long format, with more likeable characters, and with more emphasis on the beauty of the con and less on playing sleight-of-hand with the viewers.
The cast is solid: Robert Vaughn as the old pro; Adrian Lester (a relative newcomer) as the leader of the gang, Jaime Murray (a total newcomer) as the femme fatale, Mark Warren (recently in Band of Brothers) looking like a younger incarnation of Dennis Leary, and longtime British TV actor Robert Glenister as the trusty jack-of-all-trades.
They’re about 10 episodes into the first season right now, and I think I’ve watched all of them so far. I’m gonna try to review each episode as it comes out, and try to catch up on the back episodes here eventually.
Any other fans of Hustle? Leave your comments!
Posted by
Chris – March 27, 2006
Michael Spencer (aka iMonk) has a nice little series over at internetmonk.com entitled “Postcards to a Young Theologian”. There’s some good stuff there for theologians of all ages. It’s primarily aimed at Calvinists, but there’s stuff there for everybody.
Part 1: Introduction.
Part 2: Be suspicious of guilt that comes from crossing the perceived boundaries of a group.
Part 3: Be honest: Does the logic of a group eventually conclude that other Christians are, in fact, not true believers at all?
Worth the time to read.
Posted by
Chris – March 25, 2006
Mark Steyn has an excellent column today reminding us that we simply must stand up for our brother Abdul Rahman, on trial for his life in Afghanistan, his only crime being leaving Islam to convert to Christianity.
The argument in a nutshell:
If Islam is a religion one can only convert to, not from, then in the long run it is a threat to every free person on the planet.
You should read the whole article.
Posted by
Chris – March 23, 2006
I placed an order today for some music that I’ve dreamed about playing for a long time: Claude Bolling’s Suite for Flute and Jazz Piano Trio. (The link is to the audio CD so you can listen to samples. I ordered the sheet music.) This is some phenomenal jazz/classical/whatever-the-heck-it-is fusion. I dunno when I first heard it – sometime in high school, I suppose, and immediately I wished I could get with a trio and play it. But that seemed unlikely and the folio with the instrumental parts cost about 50 bucks.
Flash forward to today. I was looking online for a decent collection of Debussy piano music, and while browsing, came across the Bolling suite again. I decided that I could now manage the 45 bucks, so I ordered it. I also know a couple good flute players and a really good bass player, so I might just be able to get a little trio together to work some of it up. I know I’ll need to get practicing on it – it’s some challenging stuff. But I’m excited to just give it a shot.